At our just concluded capacity-building training in Sokoto, mindsets were shifted and barriers were removed to promote real change. The meeting focused on strengthening accountability frameworks regarding the post-moratorium cycle of the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities Prohibition Act. The theme of the meeting is Capacity Building on the Disability Act in Sokoto State.

At the meeting, participants learned that the the Human Rights Model of Disability is a transformative approach that asserts everyone—whether with or without disabilities—deserves equal access, dignity, and opportunity. This philosophy is not just theoretical; it has real-world implications, as evidenced by the recent enactment of the Sokoto State Disability Law. This law ensures that persons with disabilities enjoy the same rights and protections as all citizens, reinforcing the notion that disability is not a limitation, but a facet of human diversity.

Participants also learned that language plays a critical role in shaping perceptions. Using appropriate terminology shows respect, dignity, and promotes inclusion. During our Capacity Training in Sokoto State, we are committed to shifting minds and fostering inclusive communication that uplifts rather than diminishes. The facilitator focused on the following:

Say This:

• Persons with disabilities (instead of “PWDs”)
• Children with disabilities
• Wheelchair user
• Deaf or hard of hearing
• Non-verbal or non-speaking
• Person with a physical, intellectual, developmental, or cognitive disability

Avoid This:

• Abbreviations like “PWDs”
• “Physically challenged”
• Terms like “deaf and dumb,” “mute,” “crippled,” “retarded,” or “mentally challenged”

Inclusive language builds an inclusive society. It shapes our understanding and attitudes towards disability. By consciously choosing our words, we can foster an environment of respect and equality.

Furthermore, it was mentioned that many still view disability through outdated and limiting lenses. The following models reflect these misconceptions:

• The Charity Model sees persons with disabilities as objects of pity who need help.
• The Medical Model focuses solely on “fixing” the individual.
• The Social Model shifts the blame to societal barriers rather than addressing the needs of individuals.
• The Rights-Based Model champions equality, dignity, and inclusion, aligning with the Human Rights Model.